<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Gray Blog &#187; Pharmaceuticals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=19" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>A Blog dedicated to news, laws and trends involving the parallel market.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:24:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE AFFIRMS FINDING AGAINST DIFFERENTIATED PRICING STRUCTURES INTENDED TO DISCOURAGE PARALLEL MARKET SALES</title>
		<link>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=65</link>
		<comments>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=65#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cour of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Court of Justice has ruled in GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited v Commission and Others, a case arising from Spain, that differentiated pricing agreements intended to discourage parallel market sales violate European competition laws but has found that exemptions to that rule were not properly investigated. In March 1998, the pharmaceuticals manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline Unlimited (‘GSK’) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The European Court of Justice has ruled in <a href="http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2009-10/cp090085en.pdf" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/curia.europa.eu');"><em>GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited v Commission and Others</em></a>, a case arising from Spain, that differentiated pricing agreements intended to discourage parallel market sales violate European competition laws but has found that exemptions to that rule were not properly investigated.</p>
<p>In March 1998, the pharmaceuticals manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline Unlimited (‘GSK’) entered into an agreement with 75 Spanish wholesalers establishing a two tier price structure for medicinal products sold in Spain or exported from Spain.  The purpose of this differentiated pricing structure was to discourage parallel market sales of pharmaceuticals.</p>
<p>GSK submitted its price conditions to the European Commission seeking a ruling that they did not violate European rules against competitive restrictions. On May 8, 2001, the Commission decided that GSK’s general sales conditions were prohibited by Community competition law, because they constituted an agreement restricting competition and because GSK had not proved that the agreement met a recognized exception.</p>
<p>GSK brought suit seeking to overturn the Commission’s ruling.  On September 27, 2006 the court of first instance <a href="http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/form.pl?lang=EN&amp;Submit=rechercher&amp;numaff=T-168/01" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/curia.europa.eu');">upheld</a> the Commission’s finding principal finding but required the Commission to do further investigation regarding GSK’s claim of exemption.  Both GSK and the Commission appealed.</p>
<p>On October 6, 2009, the European Court of Justice, in its appellate capacity, <a href="http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2009-10/cp090085en.pdf" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/curia.europa.eu');">affirmed</a> the lower court&#8217;s ruling that GSK’s agreement violates European rules against competitive restrictions.  The Court also found that in order to be subject to an exemption, an agreement must contribute to improving the production or distribution of goods or to promoting technical or economic progress.  The Court affirmed the Court of the First Instance’s ruling that the Commission had not conducted an adequate review of the claim of exemption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=65</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recall of counterfeit Zyprexa® allegedly co-mingled with parallel product in UK</title>
		<link>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=16</link>
		<comments>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=16#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The British Medicines and Healthcare Products Agency (MHRA) has issued a drug alert and recall regarding the presence of allegedly counterfeit Zyprexa® 10 mg tablets in the United Kingdom. Zyprexa® is an anti-psychotic drug, manufactured by Eli Lilly Company, which is used to treat persons with schizophrenia and bi-polar disorder. The counterfeit pills only contain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&amp;nodeId=5" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.mhra.gov.uk');">British Medicines and Healthcare Products Agency</a> (MHRA) has issued a <a href="http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&amp;ssDocName=CON2031279&amp;ssSourceNodeId=387&amp;ssTargetNodeId=364" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.mhra.gov.uk');">drug alert</a> and recall regarding the presence of allegedly counterfeit <a href="http://www.zyprexa.com/index.jsp" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.zyprexa.com');">Zyprexa</a>® 10 mg tablets in the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">United Kingdom</st1:place></st1:country-region>. <span> </span>Zyprexa® is an anti-psychotic drug, manufactured by <a href="http://www.lilly.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.lilly.com');">Eli Lilly Company</a>, which is used to treat persons with schizophrenia and bi-polar disorder. <span> </span>The counterfeit pills only contain about 60% of the labeled active ingredient and may contain other degradants. <span> </span><strong><span style="font-weight: normal">The suspect products being recalled include any parallel distributed stock of Lots A200127, A216454 and A229505 (and lot variants) of Olanzapine tablets 10mg branded as Zyprexa</span></strong>®<strong><span style="font-weight: normal">. <span>  </span><o:p></o:p></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-weight: normal"><span></span><o:p></o:p></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">According the the MHRA the counterfeit product entered the British market through parallel market imports from <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">France</st1:place></st1:country-region>. <span> </span>The MHRA noted in its alert that the <a href="http://www.emea.europa.eu/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.emea.europa.eu');">European Medicines Agency</a> (EMEA) has allowed 40 UK parallel market distributors to supply this product to the British market but did not clarify if this counterfeit product entered the market through one of these parallel market distributors.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Parallel medicines and health care products may legally be sold in the parallel market within the European Union. <span> </span><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Britain</st1:country-region></st1:place> recognizes two forms of parallel trade in such products based on the authorizing agency. <span> </span>Parallel distributed products have a marketing authorization issued by the EMEA and parallel imported products have a marketing authorization issued by the MHRA.<span>  </span>In both cases the repacking and relabelling are inspected by the MHRA but the importation and/or distribution takes place outside the original manufacturer’s supply chain.<strong><o:p></o:p></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=16</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
