<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Gray Blog &#187; Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=21" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>A Blog dedicated to news, laws and trends involving the parallel market.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:24:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apple goes after clone maker Psystar</title>
		<link>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=41</link>
		<comments>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=41#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Sale Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple, Inc., manufacturer of the well known line of computers and software, filed suit on July 3 in the federal district court for the northern district of California against Florida company Psystar, Inc.   The suit alleges counts for violation of its shrink wrap license, trademark and copyright infringement.  Psystar has been manufacturing and selling [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple, Inc., manufacturer of the well known line of computers and software, filed suit on July 3 in the federal district court for the northern district of California against Florida company Psystar, Inc.   The suit alleges counts for violation of its shrink wrap license, trademark and copyright infringement.  Psystar has been manufacturing and selling a line of computers which sell pre-installed with Apple&#8217;s OSX operating system.  Apple&#8217;s shrink wrap license which comes with OSX specifically requires that the software be installed only on Apple branded computers.  Psystar has previously expressed defiance at claims that it might be violating Apple&#8217;s rights.  Statements that Apple&#8217;s license might violate US monopoly law have been <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1685" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/blogs.zdnet.com');">attributed</a> to Psystar employees.   We will monitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=41</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft to Settles with UK Parallel Importer</title>
		<link>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=32</link>
		<comments>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=32#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp has negotiated an undisclosed money settlement with UK parallel market reseller Pyramid Distribution Ltd. The settlement follows a High Court ruling that Pyramid violated Microsoft&#8217;s legal rights by importing tens of thousands of copies of Microsoft software from outside of the European Union.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft Corp has negotiated an undisclosed money settlement with UK parallel market reseller Pyramid Distribution Ltd.  The settlement follows a High Court ruling that Pyramid violated Microsoft&#8217;s legal rights by importing tens of thousands of copies of Microsoft software from outside of the European Union.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=32</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Microsoft lawsuits against unauthorized resellers (revised)</title>
		<link>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=20</link>
		<comments>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=20#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft Corporation continued its aggressive campaign against parallel market importers and against companies that pre-installed unlicensed copies of their well known operating system and office packages by filing six nine new lawsuits in Florida: MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. AMERICAN BEGONIA CORPORATION ET AL, 1:07-CV-21642 MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. COMPUTERS &#38; LAPTOPS CENTER, INC. ET AL, 1:07-CV-21643 MICROSOFT [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/en/us/default.aspx" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.microsoft.com');">Microsoft Corporation</a> continued its aggressive campaign against parallel market importers and against companies that pre-installed unlicensed copies of their well known operating system and office packages by filing <strike>six</strike> nine new lawsuits in Florida:</p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal">MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. AMERICAN BEGONIA CORPORATION ET AL, 1:07-CV-21642<br />
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. COMPUTERS &amp; LAPTOPS CENTER, INC. ET AL, 1:07-CV-21643<br />
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. COMPUGLOBE, INC. ET AL, 0:07-CV-60900<br />
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. KEN&#8217;S COMPUTERS INC. ET AL, 5:07-CV-00258<br />
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. PC TOUCH OF FLORIDA, CORP. ET AL, 1:07-CV-21644<br />
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. TAKE A BYTE COMPUTERS, INC. ET AL, 0:07-CV-60901<br />
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. CRUZ ET AL, 8:07-CV-01117<br />
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. GUNTHER, 3:07-CV-00596<br />
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. NETFX PRO, INC. ET AL, 3:07-CV-00597<span>   </span></p></blockquote>
<p>The suits filed in the Middle and Southern Districts of Florida set forth claims of copyright and trademark infringement as well as state counts for unfair competition.  This wave of lawsuits principally seems to focus on pre-installers of unlicensed software.   Much of this software is purchased overseas and enters the country in through the parallel market.   They add to the growing number of lawsuits recently filed in other parts of the country by Microsoft against parallel market software importers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=20</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
